It was not seen your shipments regarding examined points differed somewhat regarding the regular shipping. Concurrently, IDI directory didn’t establish the clear presence of floors or threshold consequences regarding the analysis (just when it comes to goods 9 “We continue searching for things” performed a little roof impression tell you for everyone three examples). Frequency research to own individual test facts exhibited no problems that have investigation granulation. In that respect, all the items was in fact utilized in after that analyses. This may be on account of reaction lay prejudice, particularly public desirability and you can acquiescence.

Factorial Validity

By applying the Velicer MAP method, it was found that the optimal number of components to be extracted is one, which confirms the original factor structure of the questionnaire. The effect was observed both when the results of the interviewees were analyzed together and when they were divided into validation groups. Subsequently, the result obtained by MAP was verified by means of principal component analysis with oblimin rotation. As the criterion for the number of factors to be isolated, the eigenvalue was set to be equal to at least 2. Assumptions of factor analysis were met [KMO = 0.908; chi ( 91 ) 2 = 1; p < 0.001]. The created factor explains a total of % variance of the questionnaire. The factor structure was checked for the three validation groups, there were no significant differences in the size of explained variance: early adulthood (%), young adolescence (%), problem group (%). The obtained factorial results correspond to the expected one factor dimensions of the original version of the Questionnaire.

Parallel analysis indicated that a-one-factor service is the most likely for everyone around three this new products. As the expressed into the Table dos, the one-grounds model shown good product loadings and you will equivalent efficiency was indeed noticed concerning your product loadings over the around three products. All circumstances loaded saliently on this subject foundation, which have product packing ranged anywhere between 0.505 and you will 0.719 during the early adulthood try. Throughout the kids it had been ranging from 0.464 and you can 0.770 plus the problem group it absolutely was ranging from 0.eight hundred and you can 0.668. A reduced loadings remained high, verifying brand new coherent build of your Polish style of the fresh appliance.

The next phase included contrasting the outcomes of your design fitted methods from other readily available knowledge. There were zero extreme differences between the brand new model fitted results obtained regarding the confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). This new Polish kind of RS-14 showed a coherent one-dimensional basis construction with reples.

On the other hand, it must be listed one to throughout the three shot validation teams zero major differences had been seen. Detail by detail results are offered from inside the Table step three.

Cross-Class Authenticity Precision of Balances

Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was applied to look at the inner consistency regarding new obtained questionnaire signs. The outcomes was demonstrated less than.

Brand new accuracy of authored basis try 0.853 (overall take to) throughout the validation trial, and therefore confirms the highest consistency. After department towards validation organizations, zero high differences in measure surface were noticed. Cronbach’s alphas varied anywhere between 0.824 and you may 0.871 along the about three examples:

The highest accuracy of the acquired basis is of the young adults (? = 0.871) and you can respectively lowest of the condition class: (? = 0.824).

Therefore, the internal consistency reliability of the RS-14 is not only acceptable across all sample populations, but also rather robust. Additionally, the analysis of the discriminative power of individual items shows that all test items are positively correlated with the scale. Because of the slight variation in Cronbach’s Alpha value for items where the correlation with the scale was <0.300, it was decided to include all test items in the factor. The exact results are shown in Table 4 below.