Gonzaga, Grams. C., Haselton, Meters. G., Smurda, J., Davies, Meters. S., & Poore, J. C. (2008). Evolution and you can Person Decisions, 29(2), 119–126.

Hazan, C., & Diamond, L. Yards. (2000). The spot regarding attachment inside human mating. Breakdown of Standard Psychology, 4(2), 186–204.

Kraut, Roentgen., Kiesler, S., Boneva, B., Cummings, J., Helgeson, V., & Crawford, A great. (2002). Sites paradox revisited. Journal out-of Public Products, 58(1), 49–74.

Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Websites contradiction: A personal technology you to definitely decrease social wedding and you may emotional better-being? American Psychologist, 53(9), 1017–1031.

Kreider, R.M., & Areas, J. M. (2001). Count, time, and you can lifetime of marriages and you will divorces. Latest Population Accounts, 70-80, (Washington, DC: You.S. Census Bureau, 2005).

Lemieux, R., & Hale, J. L. (2002). Cross-sectional study off intimacy, welfare, and relationship: Evaluation the presumptions of one’s triangular idea out-of love. Mental Reports, 90(step 3,Pt1), 1009-1014. doi:/PR0.90.3.1009-1014

Lockwood, P., Dolderman, D., Sadler, P., & Gerchak, Age. (2004). Feeling ideal regarding the doing even worse: Societal reviews in this close relationships. Journal of Identification and you will Social Therapy, 87(1), 80–95.

Maner, J. K., Miller, S. L., Rouby, D. A beneficial., & Gailliot, Meters. T. (2009). Intrasexual vigilance: The fresh implicit cognition away from close competition. Journal from Identity and you will Societal Mindset, 97(1), 74–87.

A. (2001)mitment and you can matchmaking restoration elements

Maner, J. K., Rouby, D. A beneficial., & Gonzaga, Grams. C. (2008). Automatic inattention to help you glamorous possibilities: The fresh new progressed therapy from relationships repairs. Progression and you will Human Decisions, 29(5), 343–349.

pold, B. Elizabeth. (1981). Sequential data out-of conflict and you will agreement when you look at the upset and nondistressed relationship people. Journal of Asking and you will Clinical Therapy, 49(4), 554–567.

McKenna, K. Y. An excellent., Environmentally friendly, A great. S., Gleason, Yards. J. (2002). Relationship formation on line: What’s the huge interest? Diary off Societal Facts, 58(1), 9–31.

The advantages of positive illusions: Idealization together with construction out of fulfillment in intimate matchmaking

Neff, L. A beneficial., & Karney, B. Roentgen. (2002). Self-evaluation motives inside the close matchmaking: A style of international improvement and you will certain confirmation. Inside P. Noller & J. A great. Feeney (Eds.), Facts ents about study of partners communications (pp. 32–58). Nyc, NY: Cambridge School Press.

Obegi, J. H. (2008). The development of the consumer-counselor bond from contact lens away from connection principle. Psychotherapy: Concept, Lookup, Practice, Degree, 45(4), 431-446. doi:/a0014330

Pickett, C. L., & Gardner, W. L. (2005). New public keeping track of system: Increased awareness to social cues once the an adaptive response to public exemption. Within the K. D. Williams, J. P. Forgas, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), This new personal outcast: Ostracism, personal exclusion, rejection, and bullying (pp. 213–226). Ny, NY: Mindset Force.

Pierce, T., & Lydon, J. Elizabeth. (2001). Around the globe and you will particular relational models on experience of societal relationships. Diary regarding Personality and you may Social Psychology, 80(4), 613–631.

Rholes, W. S., Simpson, J. A., Tran, S., ). Attachment and suggestions seeking inside the personal dating. Character and Public Therapy Bulletin, 33(3), 422–438.

Ross, L. R., & Spinner, B. (2001). Standard and you may specific attachment representations into the adulthood: Will there be a romance?. Diary Regarding Public And personal Relationships, 18(6), 747-766. doi:407501186001

Rusbult, C. Age usbekisk kvindelig., Olsen, N., Davis, J. L., & Hannon, P. During the J. Harvey & An effective. Wenzel (Eds.), Romantic close dating: Fix and you can improvement (pp. 87–113). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Schul, Y., & Vinokur, A beneficial. D. (2000). Projection actually perception certainly partners once the a purpose of the latest similarity in their common experience. Personality And you will Societal Mindset Bulletin, 26(8), 987-1001. doi:1672002610008

Seligman, C., Fazio, Roentgen. H., & Zanna, Yards. P. (1980). Aftereffects of salience out-of extrinsic advantages towards preference and you may loving. Journal from Identification and you can Public Mindset, 38(3), 453–460.