New authenticity and you can reliability of your questionnaire was checked and you will remedied based on the pre-shot

0
47

New authenticity and you can reliability of your questionnaire was checked and you will remedied based on the pre-shot

With the , this study selected a couple of categories within the Chengdu Shishi secondary school and Jinniu secondary school correspondingly, https://datingranking.net/tr/christianmingle-inceleme/ marketed 3 hundred questionnaires, recovered 278 surveys, subtracted a dozen incorrect surveys and you may 266 valid forms. The latest certified research is actually completed out of .

Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) showed that the sports leisure attitude scale with 16 items was suitable for factor analysis (KMO = 0.87, Bartlett’s test for sphericity p < 0.001), and three common factors could be extracted, and the corresponding Cronbach' ? coefficients were 0.84, 0.81, and 0.83 respectively. In addition, the overall scale ? coefficient = 0.85; Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) showed that the fitness indexes AGFI, CFI, NFI, and IFI were 0.92, 0.95, 0.93, and 0.91, which were all greater than the standard of 0.90, RMSEA = 0.03 (less than 0.05, with good adaptation); In addition, the combined reliability of the three common factors (potential variables) is more than 0.79, which shows that the scale has good reliability and validity.

Canonical correlation analysis was an analytical approach always shot brand new correlation education ranging from you to definitely set of handle variables plus one group away from requirement variables

Exploratory factor analysis showed that the leisure motivation scale with 21 items was suitable for factor analysis (KMO = 0.78, Bartlett’s test for sphericity p < 0.001). The scale could extract 4 common factors, corresponding to Cronbach' ? coefficient is between 0.79–0.85, and the overall scale ? Coefficient = 0.88; Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the fitness indexes AGFI, CFI, NFI, and IFI were 0.91, 0.92, 0.92, and 0.93, which were all greater than the standard of 0.90, RMSEA = 0.04 (less than 0.05, good adaptation); In addition, the combined reliability of the four dimensions (potential variables) is more than 0.81, which shows that the reliability and validity of this scale are good.

Exploratory factor analysis showed that the leisure barriers scale with 17 items was suitable for factor analysis (KMO = 0.85, Bartlett ball test p < 0.001). The scale could extract three common factors, corresponding to Cronbach’ ? coefficient is between 0.82–0.86, and the overall scale ? Coefficient = 0.85; Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the fitness indexes AGFI, CFI, NFI, and IFI were 0.94, 0.90, 0.91, and 0.93, which were all greater than the standard of 0.90, RMSEA = 0.02 (less than 0.05, good adaptation); In addition, the combined reliability of the three dimensions (potential variables) is more than 0.79, which shows that the reliability and validity of this scale are good.

Exploratory factor analysis showed that the leisure satisfaction scale with 25 items was suitable for factor analysis (KMO = 0.82, Bartlett’s test for sphericity p < 0.001). The scale could extract 6 common factors, corresponding to Cronbach' ? coefficient is between 0.81–0.86, and the overall scale ? Coefficient = 0.84; Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the fitness indexes AGFI, CFI, NFI, and IFI were 0.91, 0.93, 0.95, and 0.92 in order, which was all greater than the standard of 0.90, RMSEA = 0.03 (less than 0.05, good adaptation); In addition, the combined reliability of the six dimensions (potential variables) is more than 0.81, which shows that the reliability and validity of this scale are good.

Mathematical Statistics

It is designed to find the restriction correlation amongst the linear integration of control details together with linear blend of standards variables. Ergo, canonical relationship analysis screening the new canonical relationship combination of numerous expectations parameters and you will multiple control variables, Canonical relationship studies can cause a variety of tall and you may unimportant canonical correlation. Essentially, it will provide the adopting the very first information: you’re an average correlation coefficient can also be echo the brand new correlation training within linear mixture of control details together with linear consolidation out-of practical variables. The average correlation coefficient need certainly to visited a life threatening height to represent the significant correlation between the two groups of linear combos. The second reason is the new judgment coefficient (i.elizabeth., the square property value typical correlation coefficient Roentgen). This means your normal issues of your own important adjustable is getting told me by the regular facts of handle varying (not less than ten%). The 3rd is the structural coefficient (normal stream). It’s meant to handle the relationship between the changeable and you may the fresh new expectations changeable on their particular typical linear combinations. Absolutely the value of the newest coefficient must be over 0.31 to spell it out one to the respective regular linear combinations enjoys explanatory stamina.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here