Investigation had been analysed using SPSS twenty-five.0. Very first detailed analyses was in fact performed, along with Cronbach’s alphas and you will frequencies. Digital logistic regressions were utilized to assess contacts between gender, many years, sexual orientation, having an intimate/sexual mate, SNS utilized, sexting normalisation and readiness to engage in sexting given that separate details, as well as the four sexting behaviors while the situated variables. Nagelkerke’s Roentgen dos try thought to be a way of measuring effect dimensions. The details was indeed inserted into the design additionally. The research has also been stratified by intercourse.
Incidence regarding sexting behaviours
The most frequent sexting behaviors are becoming (21.2%) and receiving thru a mediator (28.4%), followed by 3rd-party forwarding regarding intimate posts (nine.3%) and, finally, delivering (8.1%). Detailed analytics are offered inside Desk 2.
The new regression habits was indeed extreme. Nagelkerke’s R 2 was .42 towards “sending” design, .31 to your “receiving” model, .23 for the “third-team forwarding” design, and you can .17 toward “finding via a mediator” design (Dining table 3:
Throughout the “sending” model, readiness in order to sext (OR: 8.26; 95% trust period [CI]: 5.36-), with a romantic/intimate lover (OR: step three.44; 95% CI: dos.25-5.25), playing with Snapchat (OR: step 1.87; 95% CI: 1.19-dos.93), sexual orientation (OR: 1.77; 95% CI: step 1.04-3.00) and you may many years (OR: step one.36; 95% CI: step one.step one4-1.63) were notably about giving involvement. In the “receiving” design, that have an enchanting/sexual lover (OR: 3.dos7; 95% CI: 2.51-4.28), desire to help you sext (OR: 2.79; 95% CI: dos.01-3.89), playing with Instagram (OR: step 1.89; 95% CI: 1.16-3.10), gender (OR: step one.82; 95% CI: step one.37-2.41), playing with Snapchat (OR: 1.6step 1; 95% CI: step 1.21-dos.14), sexting normalisation (OR: step one.49; 95% CI: step 1.20-1.86) and you can age (OR: 1.26; 95% CI: step 1.12-step 1.41) was indeed notably regarding acquiring involvement.
About “third-team forwarding” design, using Instagram (OR: dos.74; 95% CI: step one.1six-6.51), willingness so you can sext (OR: dos.00; 95% CI: 1.48-2.72), intercourse (OR: step 1.96; 95% CI: 1.3dos-2.91), that have an intimate/sexual companion (OR: step one.86; 95% CI: step one.29-dos.68), using Facebook (OR: step 1.53; 95% CI: 1.03-dos.26), sexting normalisation (OR: step 1.43; 95% CI: step 1.09-step 1.87) and you can ages (OR: 1.43; 95% CI: step 1.22-1.66) was indeed somewhat associated with engagement into the third-group forwarding.
In the “finding through an intermediary” model, using Instagram Moldova hembra (OR: dos.step 16; 95% CI: step 1.47-step 3.19), sexting normalisation (OR: 1.84; 95% CI: step one.5dos-dos.24), with an enchanting/sexual spouse (OR: 1.71; 95% CI: 1.35-2.17), intercourse (OR: step one.4step 1; 95% CI: step 1.1step 1-step 1.80) and you can many years (OR: 1.36; 95% CI: step one.23-step one.49) had been notably connected with engagement inside the choosing via an intermediary.
Intercourse distinctions
The new regression designs was indeed tall. Nagelkerke’s R 2 is .fifty for women and you can .41 to possess guys on the “sending” model; .30 for women and you can .30 getting boys to the “receiving” model; .18 for girls and .twenty four to own men to the “third-group forwarding” model; and you can .fourteen for females and you may .twenty-two having men to your “searching through an intermediary” model (Dining table 4:
In the “sending” design, for females, willingness to help you sext (OR: ; 95% CI: -), which have an intimate/sexual partner (OR: cuatro.54; 95% CI: dos.27-9.09) and ages (OR: step 1.60; 95% CI: step 1.17-dos.20) have been somewhat regarding sending engagement. To possess males, they certainly were determination so you can sext (OR: six.05; 95% CI: 3.68-nine.94), having an enchanting/sexual partner (OR: 2.79; 95% CI: 1.59-4.88) and ultizing Snapchat (OR: 2.38; 95% CI: step one.32-4.29).
About “receiving” design, for girls, desire to help you sext (OR: 5.11; 95% CI: 2.57-), having fun with Instagram (OR: cuatro.34; 95% CI: 1.43-), that have an enchanting/intimate spouse (OR: 3.77; 95% CI: dos.49-5.72), sexting normalisation (OR: step one.62; 95% CI: step 1.13-dos.33) and you may decades (OR: step one.42; 95% CI: step 1.step 17-step one.72) was somewhat about researching engagement. To possess boys, these people were with an intimate/sexual spouse (OR: dos.97; 95% CI: 2.08-cuatro.25), willingness to help you sext (OR: 2.32; 95% CI: step 1.58-3.41), playing with Snapchat (OR: dos.03; 95% CI: 1.38-dos.91), sexting normalisation (OR: 1.40; 95% CI: step one.06-step one.86) and you can years (OR: step 1.20; 95% CI: step one.04-1.38).